A complete, agent-on-database automation platform delivered for a healthcare revenue cycle & billing solutions provider — from patient check-in to cash receipt — covering nine AI opportunity groups across eligibility, coding, claims, denials, collections and reporting.
Our client runs both sides of the healthcare billing stack — a proprietary web-based EMR, and a large Medisoft reseller and billing-services business serving outpatient practices across the United States. Its 15–16 person billing team processes claims for practices running on a 40-year-old client-server billing system with no automation layer of its own.
| Industry | Healthcare · Revenue Cycle Management |
| Client role | Medisoft reseller & billing services provider |
| Domain experience | 15+ years |
| Billing team | 15–16 staff, India-based operations |
| Annual claim volume | ~96,000 claims |
| Billing ops cost today | ~8% of collected revenue |
| Engagement model | Fixed-scope, milestone-gated, 100% Outcome SLA |
| Delivery timeline | Phased · MVP pilot + Phase 3 |
Conservative coding, manual superbills and denials caught weeks too late aren’t failures of effort — they’re the natural ceiling of doing payer-grade work by hand, claim after claim, twenty minutes at a time.
Front-desk and billing staff re-key the same data from cards, forms and superbills by hand, again and again.
Errors and denials surface weeks after submission — long after the moment they could have been caught.
Institutional knowledge — payer rules, coding logic, appeal language — lives in people’s heads, not in the system.
Agents connect directly to Medisoft’s Advantage DB via ODBC — they never touch the UI. The biller opens Medisoft and finds records already populated, with exceptions flagged in a separate console. Conservative coding, manual superbills and denials caught weeks too late aren’t failures of effort — they’re the natural ceiling of doing payer-grade work by hand. This architecture removes that ceiling, stage by stage, across the entire billing lifecycle.
Insurance cards · driving licenses · paper superbills · provider Excel · EMR data · ERA/EOB files
Tiered OCR (T0→T3) · NLP · rules engine · denial AI · payment posting · confidence scoring · ODBC to Advantage DB
MWPAT · MWCAS · MWINS · MWELG · MWTRN · MWCLA — biller opens Medisoft, data is already there
Agents process ~95% of records automatically. The remaining ~5% where confidence is low are flagged in the Biller Console with the source image, the agent’s best guess, a confidence score, and the specific reason for uncertainty. The biller reviews only what the agent isn’t sure about — never every record. Nothing is ever silently dropped.
Automation agents built directly into the EMR workflow — code suggestion, superbill, claim validation, denial management, payment posting.
Make billing pluggable via standard APIs — not hard-wired to any single EHR or billing system.
For the Medisoft reseller base — AI accelerators on top of Medisoft without modifying its core.
From the moment a patient checks in to the moment quality measures are reported — every stage of the revenue cycle is covered by a purpose-built agent, all running on the same shared platform.
The data spine, biller console, cloud infrastructure and audit layer every opportunity above depends on — audited read/write path, exception queue, Azure infrastructure, RBAC and full traceability.
Each of the nine opportunities below was scoped, built and validated against the client’s own workflow documentation and live Medisoft data — not synthetic samples.
Front-desk staff still key insurance details by hand from scanned cards and paper intake forms, spending 5–10 minutes per patient. Coverage errors only surface weeks later when a claim is rejected, because no one checks that the plan on file is active on the date of service.
Card and ID capture flows straight through to a real-time payer coverage check — before the patient sits down. OCR extraction, identity verification and eligibility lookups all run automatically at check-in.
Superbill creation is a seven-step manual sequence that takes 25–30 minutes, with paper-based practices re-keying every code, modifier and service level by hand. Handwritten codes have no reliable capture path, so providers code conservatively from memory and leave reimbursement on the table.
Paper superbills become structured charge lines automatically. OCR extraction, evidence-based code suggestion and an audited write path turn a 30-minute manual task into a 2–3 minute automated one.
Claims go out with no pre-submission validation, so NCCI edits, modifier rules and ICD↔CPT pairing are checked manually or not at all. Payer-specific rules live only in billers’ heads, and every rejected claim triggers a full rework cycle of 25–60+ minutes.
Every claim is validated against payer rules and NCCI edits before it leaves the building. The engine checks pairing, modifiers and payer requirements automatically, flagging likely denials with the fix needed — in real time.
ERA files are downloaded by hand from every clearing house portal, and denial codes are interpreted one claim at a time. With no pattern visibility, the same denial reason recurs unnoticed across payers — and each affected claim consumes 30–60 minutes to manage.
ERA 835 files are ingested and classified by root cause — fixable versus complex. AI resolves the fixable share without a biller touching it, and every pattern found feeds straight back into coding and claim scrubbing.
Appeals for complex denials are written from scratch every time, with payer-specific language and evidence requirements that vary widely. Supporting documentation is assembled by hand for each one, so high-value denials are often written off rather than appealed.
Complex denials are routed to the biller with a payer-specific appeal already drafted. AI grounds each letter in the actual claim and clinical data, tailors tone and evidence per payer, and attaches supporting documents automatically.
Patient statements are generated and chased manually, with no prioritisation — a small balance gets the same effort as a large one. Outreach runs on a single channel with low response rates, and aging balances live in spreadsheets instead of the workflow.
Statements, reminders and escalation are handled by AI messaging agents across channels. Balances are segmented and prioritised automatically, so high-value accounts get chased first — with consent and opt-out handled by design.
There’s no consolidated AR visibility across practices and clearing houses, so follow-up is driven by whoever remembers rather than what pays back most. Secondary claims are submitted late or missed, and payer denial rates stay invisible until someone builds a report.
An aging engine ranks the next best action across every open claim and payer. Live AR visibility, automated secondary submission and a prioritised work queue replace guesswork with a system that always knows what pays back most.
MIPS measures are assembled by hand at reporting deadlines, with quality and cost data pulled from several systems manually. Gaps are discovered too late in the performance year to correct, and reporting effort competes directly with day-to-day billing work.
Quality, cost and promoting-interoperability measures are extracted automatically from live data. The engine runs continuously on the shared platform spine, so gaps surface early and reporting never competes with billing work.
The architecture is locked today, so billing AI cannot be sold independently, and there’s no audited, safe write path into the database. Billers have no single console for exceptions, and the documented schema may not match the live production database.
An audited read/write path, a single exception console and hardened cloud infrastructure make the platform pluggable into any EHR or billing system — the foundation every other opportunity in this case study builds on.
The MVP proves the platform on the highest-value, most tightly-sequenced work. Phase 3 then scales out denials, collections and reporting in two parallel waves — funded separately, once MVP results are measured.
Every figure below is grounded in the client’s workflow documentation and the platform’s own production targets — not vendor benchmarks.
| Stage | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Patient registration | 5–10 min | <15 sec |
| Clinical / charge coding | 5–10 min | <30 sec |
| Superbill creation | 25–30 min | 2–3 min |
| Claim validation | Not performed | Real-time |
| Denial management | 30–60 min | Auto / 5 min |
| Payment posting | 10–20 min | Automatic |
Wayam AI builds autonomous, production-grade AI systems — not demos that stall at proof-of-concept. Our team has built AI at Optum scale, one of the largest payers in the United States, and brings that intelligence to the provider side.
We model how claims are adjudicated, then optimise before submission.
Higher-specificity codes only when the note supports them.
Standard APIs; not hard-wired to any single EHR or billing system.
Every record accounted for; low-confidence items route to a biller.
Fixed scope, priced to the outcome. Milestone-gated, pay as value lands. 100% Outcome SLA — contractual, not aspirational.